So my number one fan DiamondGuzzler, who took issue with my MuhammedTube post, is still trying to convince me that I'm a pawn in a gigantic war between Christians and Muslims. Hopefully AOL will do the decent thing and pull his account now that I've reported his hate speech. In the meantime, he's sent yet another e-mail, in spite of having promised me that he would delete any reply.
I can't be bothered to keep sending e-mails, so here is his e-mail with my reply inserted. Have fun.
> Dear Martin,
>
> you are a very ignorant person,
Thank you. That's a good way to start putting your point across.
> will you please stop questioning my sanity,
> and stop patronising me, credit me with some intellect and the capacity to
> reason, probably better than yourself. I wish you would try to listen to
> what i am saying, it will be good practice to allow you to appreciate that
> people who disagree with you can also be rational. understood? good.
Being rational my friend is based on using logic. You have made no logical argument here - indeed, many of the things you have said are in conflict.
> Firstly you are right & I have known some very nice friendly muslims, but
> you are missing the point, which is Islam. I'm sure people who followed
> David Koresh or Hitler even were nice friendly people, but still members
> of an evil cult.
Why is it an evil cult? Ah, here we get to your argument.
> Islam preaches another Jesus, NOT the son of God, NOT crucified on the
> cross. It's not a question of who is nice not nice, it's a question of
> TRUTH. Now, if Islam is lying to you and the world, it is corrupt and has
> a purpose, the purpose is to get people to follow deception and lies
> about Jesus Christ and to follow instead Mohammed, WHY?????
But why is it Islam that is lying? Why isn't it Christianity that's lying? Have you considered that possibility? There is no more evidence to support Christianity than there is to support Islam.
More simply, your logic rests on the assumption that the Christian Jesus is "right", which is completely unproven. The Bible, along with any other book, does not constitute evidence - it is merely a written account of a possible truth, no more accurate that the person who wrote it (or in our case, translated it).
> This is the great danger Martin, Satan (the Devil) is the one who is the
> deciever , Father of lies, his purpose is to see you in hell. which is
> why it's important for you to focus.
This is all merely your opinion - you have no evidence to back it up. If you believe it, fine, but don't claim that it is a "rational" belief.
> This war against Islam is a war for your soul and truth for the cross of
> Christ, we want you saved as Christians and to know the truth, Islam wants
> to decieve you and to turn away from the truth.
What if I don't want to be Christian or Muslim? What does it matter, as long as I lead a good life? You may have "faith", but I don't go around spreading hate - I'd say that, if anything, I'm ahead of you in the queue for heaven.
Also, I can use a spell-checker.
> one of the names of 'allah' is the greatest of all decievers, your nice
> friendly muslims are just pawns and mostly ignorant of what islam really
> is. they see it as something good, worthy, religous.
As you see Christianity... but again, how do I know you're right and they're wrong?
> we as christians are not about hating muslims , we are about freeing them
> from the bondage of Islam and you are not helping Martin because you dont
> know what is going on, you are in the middle of an invisible spiritual
> war, there are forces beyond your imagining battling for your soul and
> the soul of muslims. you are not an independant observer and currently
> you are working to suppress the truth. which is not nice, it is evil.
Where have I suppressed any truth, exactly? And show me any evidence of this "war", because as far as I can see there certainly are not hordes of Muslims attempting to battle for my soul.
> Martin, if you write to me again, show me you are engaging your brain and
> appreciating what i am trying hard to communicate to you, stop patronising
> me at least enough to listen.
Every one of your rants has neatly ignored every point I've made in reply to you. I'd like you to point out precisely where I've failed to "engage my brain", or been "irrational".
Yours,
Martin.
http://layscience.net/trackback/100








It's now no longer permitted to photocopy pages from Sunderland's electoral registers, those caught doing so can be fined up to £5000.